<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Down the Grey Brick Road</title>
	<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch</link>
	<description>Switching to the wonderful world of Mac... by a lifelong PC user</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saving Images by mjolnir001</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/05/saving-images/#comment-34</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/05/saving-images/#comment-34</guid>
					<description>I had easy time reading your blog. But it seems now it's over :(. Man, this post sucks. I hope at least the next one won't be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had easy time reading your blog. But it seems now it&#8217;s over <img src='http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> . Man, this post sucks. I hope at least the next one won&#8217;t be.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A deal? On an Apple product? Sweet! by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/04/30/a-deal-on-an-apple-product-sweet/#comment-33</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/04/30/a-deal-on-an-apple-product-sweet/#comment-33</guid>
					<description>Your previous posts were real rubbish, but this is good. This one is brilliant. Your blog is getting really better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your previous posts were real rubbish, but this is good. This one is brilliant. Your blog is getting really better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Good, the bad, and the ugly (+pictures!) by Flint</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-32</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-32</guid>
					<description>I saw similar post three month ago. Topicality of this post sucks. Dude, you have to keep up to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw similar post three month ago. Topicality of this post sucks. Dude, you have to keep up to date.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A deal? On an Apple product? Sweet! by Don Tolep</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/04/30/a-deal-on-an-apple-product-sweet/#comment-31</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/04/30/a-deal-on-an-apple-product-sweet/#comment-31</guid>
					<description>well every time I meet people here, I’m sure they are very young and don’t know what to say, that’s why they write weird stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well every time I meet people here, I’m sure they are very young and don’t know what to say, that’s why they write weird stuff
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Good, the bad, and the ugly (+pictures!) by Housewife</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-30</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-30</guid>
					<description>I have been visiting sources like that lately. That’s the most important point of everything. That’s why I can professionally say that this information is objective and sounds true to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been visiting sources like that lately. That’s the most important point of everything. That’s why I can professionally say that this information is objective and sounds true to me
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A deal? On an Apple product? Sweet! by SandyCarlson</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/04/30/a-deal-on-an-apple-product-sweet/#comment-29</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/04/30/a-deal-on-an-apple-product-sweet/#comment-29</guid>
					<description>many things to discuss… But anyway I’m not going to discuss such a personal topic. Reading it is ok, but discussing it makes you look like a chatter –box and a rumor-spreader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many things to discuss… But anyway I’m not going to discuss such a personal topic. Reading it is ok, but discussing it makes you look like a chatter –box and a rumor-spreader.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Good, the bad, and the ugly (+pictures!) by MopUpDuty</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-28</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-28</guid>
					<description>I opened this website for myself long time ago. Today it has become even better. I like the links and info that is given here, I just dislike some people. They make a lot of mistakes when posting or commenting. They are usually rude and have a bunch of problems I think. They spoil this website. I would want them to leave this place alone and go somewhere else to have their kind of fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I opened this website for myself long time ago. Today it has become even better. I like the links and info that is given here, I just dislike some people. They make a lot of mistakes when posting or commenting. They are usually rude and have a bunch of problems I think. They spoil this website. I would want them to leave this place alone and go somewhere else to have their kind of fun.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saving Images by Gore Princess</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/05/saving-images/#comment-16</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 04:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/05/saving-images/#comment-16</guid>
					<description>Nate is a loser. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate is a loser. =)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Good, the bad, and the ugly (+pictures!) by Nate Perkins</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 22:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>Hot corners with expose was exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a million!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot corners with expose was exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a million!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Good, the bad, and the ugly (+pictures!) by carlmmii</title>
		<link>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-14</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 02:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nateperkins.com/mac_switch/2006/05/03/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-14</guid>
					<description>Finding windows: for the love of god, &lt;b&gt;USE EXPOSÉ&lt;/b&gt;. :p I have mine set up with hot-corners.

Top-left: dashboard
Top-right: show app windows
Bottom-left: show all windows
Bottom-right: show desktop

That way it's a simple mouse-sweep to get to another window or the desktop. I don't really like having to press function keys to show windows, because that requires my left hand to move completely, as well as requiring me to actually look at the keyboard.


Installing Apps: there's usually 3 types of installations --

1.) Drag/drop. Easiest of them all, just drag the application into your applications folder. Think of this like a standalone .exe file on the windows side. You could put it anywhere, but it makes sense to go with the rest of your applications. All you have to do is run the program.

2.) Package. Usually for system-affecting apps. These use the standard package installer process which guides you through the process.

3.) Full installation program. This is for apps like photoshop and other big apps with several support files. This most resembles what you're used to, and there really aren't that many that use this installation method nowadays.

One of the biggest things that you'll get used to is the fact that there's no registry in OS X. There's nothing system-related that an application really affects. All of an application's preferences are all stored in a preferences folder in your user directory (these will also remain if the program is removed or you upgrade, allowing you to keep the same preferences between different versions).

There's also no real need for an uninstallation program because there's practically nothing that requires it. The only thing that's left after you delete an application is its preference files, which take up so little space that it's not noticeable in the least (and since you're not running the application, there's no way they're using system resources).


What I think is the most beautiful thing about OS X's whole system though is its ability to deal with on-the-fly renaming. It doesn't matter if a file is already open -- you can rename it whenever you want, and all applications it's open in will update to reflect that. This also applies to applications in the dock. You can rename / move the applications around all you want, and the dock links will still work.


General advice: try to forget all the little roadblocks you know windows has, and look at OS X as a completely fresh operating system. It works for you, not the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding windows: for the love of god, <b>USE EXPOSÉ</b>. :p I have mine set up with hot-corners.</p>
<p>Top-left: dashboard<br />
Top-right: show app windows<br />
Bottom-left: show all windows<br />
Bottom-right: show desktop</p>
<p>That way it&#8217;s a simple mouse-sweep to get to another window or the desktop. I don&#8217;t really like having to press function keys to show windows, because that requires my left hand to move completely, as well as requiring me to actually look at the keyboard.</p>
<p>Installing Apps: there&#8217;s usually 3 types of installations &#8211;</p>
<p>1.) Drag/drop. Easiest of them all, just drag the application into your applications folder. Think of this like a standalone .exe file on the windows side. You could put it anywhere, but it makes sense to go with the rest of your applications. All you have to do is run the program.</p>
<p>2.) Package. Usually for system-affecting apps. These use the standard package installer process which guides you through the process.</p>
<p>3.) Full installation program. This is for apps like photoshop and other big apps with several support files. This most resembles what you&#8217;re used to, and there really aren&#8217;t that many that use this installation method nowadays.</p>
<p>One of the biggest things that you&#8217;ll get used to is the fact that there&#8217;s no registry in OS X. There&#8217;s nothing system-related that an application really affects. All of an application&#8217;s preferences are all stored in a preferences folder in your user directory (these will also remain if the program is removed or you upgrade, allowing you to keep the same preferences between different versions).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also no real need for an uninstallation program because there&#8217;s practically nothing that requires it. The only thing that&#8217;s left after you delete an application is its preference files, which take up so little space that it&#8217;s not noticeable in the least (and since you&#8217;re not running the application, there&#8217;s no way they&#8217;re using system resources).</p>
<p>What I think is the most beautiful thing about OS X&#8217;s whole system though is its ability to deal with on-the-fly renaming. It doesn&#8217;t matter if a file is already open &#8212; you can rename it whenever you want, and all applications it&#8217;s open in will update to reflect that. This also applies to applications in the dock. You can rename / move the applications around all you want, and the dock links will still work.</p>
<p>General advice: try to forget all the little roadblocks you know windows has, and look at OS X as a completely fresh operating system. It works for you, not the other way around.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
