Entries Tagged 'John McCain' ↓

Paul Maslin has a nice analysis of the electoral map up. There is one situation that he goes over briefly that is particularly intriguing.
<p><strong>><a href='http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/interactives/campaign08/electoral-college/'>Electoral College Prediction Map</a></strong> - Predict the winner of the general election. Use the map to experiment with winning combinations of states. Save your prediction and send it to friends.</p> <p>
Which, of course, would give Obama a win in the House.

First Read has a piece up noting the Clinton campaign’s approach to the possible convention fight. Some choice excerpts below:

Ickes argued the “superdelegates” should be called “automatic delegates” instead, because the former makes it sound like they have “superpowers.” The DNC itself refers to them as “superdelegates” and as “unpledged” delegates.

On Florida and Michigan, the campaign again said voters in those states should not be “disenfranchised” and that the states were important to the Democratic Party’s fortunes. Ickes also said Clinton didn’t vote on the DNC rules.

Ickes repeated earlier contentions that there was no reason to “re do” the votes in Florida and Michigan and didn’t directly answer if they would participate in a re-vote in Michigan. Ickes also acknowledged that it would be possible for Clinton to lose pledged delegates but control a majority of the credentials committee, which ultimately decides if and how Florida’s and Michigan’s disputed delegations would be dealt with.

This leaves me wondering whether or not the Clinton campaign is actually willing to do this. If the convention comes down to them being able to seat Florida and Michigan (which is more ridiculous, in my mind), through a rules coincidence giving them control of the credentials committee, would they go through with it? It would widely be seen as stealing the nomination infairly, and would no doubt lead many democrats to lose respect for her.

After a huge number of people have come out to vote in every primary/caucus, is she willing to offend so many of these new voters, who will probably then be more reluctant to vote in November? If she does do this, expect her to get blamed for giving John McCain the presidency.

With 12% reporting, and up by 9% over Mitt Romney, McCain is now the projected winner.

With only 9 hours to go until the first polling places in New Hampshire open, the leaders in both the Democratic and Republican races are beginning to pull away.

Obama has been siphoning votes off of Clinton since he won Iowa, but has been leaving Edwards’ voters pretty much alone. While this is a good thing for Edwards, it won’t have too much impact tomorrow, as he is going to get third place unless something changes dramatically overnight. Clinton has a small shot at reversing her slide, but I don’t think it will happen. Her crying today might help the thought that she’s cold and calculating, but it’s likely too little too late. Combine that with an alienation of some voters who no longer see her as strong enough to be President, and it won’t have much effect on anything. Obama has just been riding his “wave” (his words) and making sure not to mess up. His debate performance succeeded in that, and he will win the primary because of it. My predictions:

Obama: 38%
Clinton: 31%
Edwards: 24%

Romney’s attempt to paint McCain as the Washington insider isn’t going to work for him in New Hampshire. The voters just know him too well for it to have an impact. This is where his campaigning there in 2000 is helping him solidify support and prevent any last minute slide to Romney. Huckabee won’t see any ending fireworks like he did in Iowa. New Hampshire’s conscious rejection of the uber-religious hurts him, and third place is about the best he can hope for. If Romney does lose, it’s going to be hard to turn around a campaign that the media is going to paint as a two-man race between McCain and Huckabee. This also hurts Giuliani, as he will be getting more ignored by the media than he has been (especially if he loses to Ron Paul again). Predictions:

McCain: 32
Romney: 27
Huckabee: 13
Paul: 10
Giuliani: 9
Thompson: 9

This Suffolk poll is starting to get play in the media. It’s a useless poll at this point in the game, as it was taken before the Iowa Caucuses. The dump and dips for the winners and losers (hopefully respectively) aren’t taken into account, so it’s pretty misleading data.

This newer Suffolk poll gives Obama a 5 point swing from the last one, but still has a fatal flaw. It straddles the Iowa caucuses, so half the data it’s using is irrelevant.

Rasmussen’s is the first poll taken completely after the Iowa caucuses and shows the first true numbers being taken from New Hampshire. It has Obama up by 10 over Clinton. American Research Group’s is also out now, and was taken solely after Iowa. They give a 12 point lead to Obama. I haven’t had a chance to look through the make-up of the polled constituencies of each of these, but with them coming out so close to each other they are probably at least somewhat accurate. In the most extreme scenario this means a 24 point swing for Obama, from 12 down to 12 up on Clinton. That’s what I call a bump!

The Concord Monitor has Obama up by a point, which is the same as their Dec 14th poll. CNN/WMUR’s has it all tied up between Obama and Clinton, both with 33%. In their end of December poll, Clinton was up by 4.

On the Republican side, things are less interesting. By almost all accounts, McCain is still in the lead, with Romney having dropped off somewhat. Huckabee looks to have gained a couple points, but nothing that should cause McCain or Romney to lose any sleep.

In light of this polling data, I’m sure Clinton’s camp will be contemplating going very negative in the debate tonight, doing anything to throw off Obama’s momentum. If he exits New Hampshire with a win, especially a convincing one like the current polls, no one will be able to stop him.

Politico also has a piece worth reading up about why none of these polls should have too much trust placed in them. Here’s to waiting for Tuesday night.

The votes have been counted and delegates have been doled out. As the ramifications of the Iowa caucuses become apparent, some candidates are well on their way to new heights, while others are falling to previously unimagined lows. Should be a fun ride!

Democrats:

Source: CNN.com

Barack Obama - I think it’s fair to say that he passed most expectations of him in winning by 8 points. The only poll that had him remotely close to that margin was the widely criticized Des Moines Register. It’s got to feel good for them to end up right after taking so much ridicule.

Source: RealClearPolitics.com
As of now, Obama is down 7 in New Hampshire. While Clinton’s lead is sure to take a hit after her third-place Iowa finish, it remains to be seen whether or not Edwards will take those newly freed voters instead of Obama. If Obama does scrape by Clinton in New Hampshire, (and remember that 5 days is not long for Clinton to regain any momentum), it would be a strong lead toward Obama being the nominee, especially heading into South Carolina, a promising environment for the Illinois senator.

John Edwards - His second place finish in Iowa, not long after being an after-thought in the race, could garner a lot of free media in New Hampshire, possibly dulling Obama’s bump from his Iowa win. While it doesn’t look likely, if he somehow comes away from New Hampshire with a win, it will be a very interesting Super Tuesday, as it won’t be decided until then. He has the potential to do well in South Carolina, having been born there, and have been exposed to the media a lot next door, spilling over into South Carolina media.

Hillary Clinton - Her inevitability argument took a hit today, but not one that is impossible to recover from. For her, it’s unfortunate that she has spent so much time in Iowa to end up with a mere third place finish, had she taken a more-Giuliani tack early on, this would be written off as an expected loss. With only 5 short days to change the tone and momentum present in the political world, holding on to her 7% lead in New Hampshire could prove challenging. Her strategy for the coming week was apparent in her post-caucus remarks (hard to call it a concession speech—maybe they didn’t write a real one?), as she reminded everyone of foreign threats and the experience she says is necessary to handle them. If she does lose New Hampshire to Obama, I don’t see her coming back, no matter how resilient her family is.

Bill Richardson - No big surprises with his performance on caucus night. Just waiting until he’s through Nevada’s caucus on the 19th to drop out. Reports place him as an ally of Obama, turning his back on the Clinton family he once served as a member of 42’s cabinet.

Joe Biden & Chris Dodd - No surprises in their caucus performances either, and both will reportedly drop out soon. Biden has 3% in New Hampshire, and his endorsement could boost one of the front running campaigns.

Republicans:

Source: CNN.com

Mike Huckabee - No one had a Huckabee win of a full 9 points as the expected result Thursday night. That being said, his astounding rise to the top won’t be enough to do him too much good in New Hampshire. He’s currently down to McCain (surprise!) by over 20 points.

Source: RealClearPolitics.com
While his win will definitely give him a bump, it won’t be an extraordinary one. He’ll catapult past Giuliani, but fall short of Romney, even after his dip in the polls after the disappointment in Iowa. A strong third, along with McCain holding off Romney, could be plenty to keep him in it through Michigan (where he’s only one point down already) and to a wide-open Nevada caucus.

Mitt Romney - By far the camp with the most disappointment tonight. Less than a month ago, Romney and his well-oiled machine were running high above the Republican throng below them in Iowa, looking like nothing could stop them. To go from that to a 9 point loss to a previously unknown small-state governor has probably left the entire campaign with whiplash. Even while Iowa was slipping away, McCain resurrected himself from the grave to take the lead in New Hampshire. If Romney doesn’t find a way to win New Hampshire (and he won’t), he’s going to have a tough time holding off Huckabee in the mid-January states, and then will run into Giuliani before he knows it.

Fred Thompson - No doubt the candidate people are least excited about. Rumors were abound that a fourth or lower finish in Iowa would mean the end of his campaign. Right now, he’s hanging on to third by a few hundred votes. He’s not polling in double digits in any January state besides Nevada, and even there it is only barely. The only scenario I can see that would lead to his nomination is an unprecedented split of states among four or more candidates that leads to a convention full of wheeling and dealing. He embodies the ideals of the Republican base, so in that case it could turn to him. Not likely though. If he does drop out, he’ll likely support John McCain.

John McCain - Before the Iowa caucuses, the consensus seemed to be that a third place finish would be better than expected, and would give him a lot of free media to propel him even further ahead of a slipping Romney in New Hampshire. Right now he’s in fourth by only a few hundred votes, so he could end up in third and still get that positive media. The only problem with that is if it takes too long to develop, it won’t come together in time to make any difference in New Hampshire, a mere 5 days away. After New Hampshire, he’s got an outside shot at Michigan, and maybe California if Giuliani slips as far as some think he will. Not looking too great for the man from Arizona, however.

Ron Paul - This is a pretty amazing finish for an outside candidate that has been receiving a minimum of free media. This will make a nice story about the increasing effect of the internet on politics, but won’t lead to much in the Republican process. If he does go independent, it will be interesting to see whether or not he will be able to turn out the youth vote in the general, and if he does who it will hurt. Hard to say before the nominees are chosen, as there are such divides on the Republican side.

Rudy Giuliani - While his strategy was obviously to forgo Iowa completely and focus on Florida, a loss this bad could hurt his chances more than he was counting on. When the dust settles, he will have lost to both John McCain (who also didn’t campaign much in Iowa) and Ron Paul (mostly regarded as a political joke). His fundraising won’t be great for the next month, as the media focuses on the other candidates and their successes. January 29th is a long way away, and I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a new leader in the national Republican polls by then, which will be another blow to his electability argument.

The most exciting fact on the Republican side is that there are still four (maybe five) viable candidates. Huckabee, Romney, McCain, Giuliani, and maybe Thompson all have a chance at the nomination still. New Hampshire could remove Thompson from the equation, but will only serve to muddy the waters between the other four.

With only 40% of precincts reporting on the Republican side, McCain is already on CNN giving a “surpassed expectations” speech. Hoping to get in early and make his point to the media, so his third/fourth/fifth place finish gets coverage as a win for him. MSNBC said earlier that 15% and up means a huge win for McCain in Iowa, right now he’s hovering at around 12%, so he might not get there.

Rudy Giuliani’s “Ready”

Politics of fear executed pretty well. I guess he’s counting on viewers lumping everyone into a group of terrorists, making them feel scared. Of course, it also brings up 9/11 for pretty much everyone, which is one of Giuliani’s consistent goals. It’s fear mongering that is reminiscent of Bush’s campaigns.

Mitt Romney’s “Remember”

Probably will have more of an impact than Giuliani’s in New Hampshire (where both are airing). Acts nice in going negative on McCain.